{"id":14543,"date":"2025-03-28T08:50:48","date_gmt":"2025-03-28T08:50:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/topat10.com\/?p=14543"},"modified":"2025-03-28T08:50:48","modified_gmt":"2025-03-28T08:50:48","slug":"i-put-nvidias-rtx-50-series-laptop-gpu-to-the-test-heres-what-i-found","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/topat10.com\/?p=14543","title":{"rendered":"I Put Nvidia\u2019s RTX 50-Series Laptop GPU to the Test. Here\u2019s What I Found"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

As has often been true with DLSS, performance comes at a price in visual quality. Put simply, the more fake frames you add, especially to much lower frame rates, the more the image quality degrades. Frame generation works as promised, and when you stare at just the numbers, it\u2019s impressive. If you are after those higher frame rate numbers, adding new frames to the game improves smoothness for sure, though maybe not to the degree you might expect. Generated frames don’t feel the same as native ones. The numbers get bigger as promised, but the more extra frames you add, the more input lag is inserted into the equation.<\/p>\n

Cyberpunk 2077<\/em> is the most noteworthy example right now, hyped up for its all-in ray tracing features<\/a> and native implementation of multi-frame generation. I tested the game on the Blade 16\u2019s native 2,560 x 1,600-pixel resolution in the Ray Tracing Overdrive mode, tweaking the multi-frame generation as I went. In 2X multi-frame generation mode under the Quality setting, the RTX 5090 averaged 82 frames per second (fps). That jumped up to 115 fps in the 3X mode, making better use of the 240-Hz screen refresh rate<\/a> on the Razer Blade 16.<\/p>\n

\n