{"id":12945,"date":"2024-10-12T04:50:48","date_gmt":"2024-10-12T04:50:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/topat10.com\/?p=12945"},"modified":"2024-10-12T04:50:48","modified_gmt":"2024-10-12T04:50:48","slug":"lenovo-yoga-slim-7i-aura-edition-review-an-intel-copilot-pc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/topat10.com\/?p=12945","title":{"rendered":"Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition Review: An Intel Copilot+ PC"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

However, on more general tasks, the Yoga didn\u2019t pull through. My scores on the PCMark 10 benchmark were not markedly different than first-gen Core Ultra scores, and performance on the industry standard Geekbench 6 test was surprisingly low\u201440 percent below a typical Snapdragon X-powered laptop and 20 percent below the average Core Ultra 1. I didn\u2019t notice any particularly sluggish performance while testing (and even boot-up was speedy), but power users with 100 browser tabs open at once may start to feel some pain. On the plus side, since this is Intel silicon on the x86 architecture, the system doesn\u2019t have any app compatibility issues that Snapdragon machines suffer from on the ARM architecture.<\/p>\n

In any case, while it\u2019s impossible to draw a broad conclusion about the performance of a CPU based on a single laptop, this at least serves as a starting point.<\/p>\n

\n